On a related note, I was going to keep this in stealth mode but changed my mind recently. I've applied for a patent--wrote it up at night, sent it in with me fees, etc. I believe I have uncovered a method and apparatus for attracting idiots and confirming their stupidity through commenting. Here's an example tidbit from a
By definition, it is difficult, effectively impossible, to prove a negative. But the science puts constraints on how a viable EEStor dielectric might work. Those are very far away from anything that we have ever seen, and for fundamental reasons. You don't get proved false from this. You get proved quite extraordinarily unlikely. That is as near to false as we get in science.
Thanks Professor. Let's see.... of the 14000 steps EEStor needs to complete to become a commercially viable entity, I guess number 13,996 is test the components for energy density. Brilliant. In the meantime, EEStor will be as near to false as science allows.
3 comments:
Necessity is the mother of invention. The way I read the description section of the patent, necessity came from crash testing a prototype. It's a very practical invention to address a real-world problem with a real-world device.
Where in the application did they mention crash testing?
Section 23 mentions what could happen in the event of an accident, but not crash testing a prototype.
"... I believe I have uncovered a method and apparatus for attracting idiots and confirming their stupidity through commenting."
Sounds promising, although you may need to review any previous patents for the like that have been submitted by political sites and youtube and be prepared to prove that your technicology is unique. Best o' luck my friend.
Post a Comment