According to a FOIA release from the US Department of Energy, battery manufacturer-in-the-making, A123 Systems (a company whose founder once tried to replicate an EEStor EESU) has applied for $1Bil in loans as part of the 2007 Energy Independence & Security Act. The list of applications for the Department of Energy program is a who's who & who's new of automotive technology including the big 3, Ford ($11 Bil request), Chrysler ($8.5 Bil request) and GM ($11.8 Bil request).
Notably present are previously discussed application listings (with amounts included) from Kleiner Perkins investments Fisker Automotive, V-Vehicle, & Th!nk North America. The combined request of these entities likely exceeds $1Bil making Kleiner one of the largest enthusiasts of using government funding for risky start-up ventures. Kleiner Perkins has
investments in 2 stealth battery companies and EEStor Inc., the pre-eminent stealth energy storage manufacturer in the world. It is interesting to note that the funds Fisker apparently applied for were smaller than those they received.
I've written before about the close ties Kleiner Perkins has to the Obama administration including John Doerr's role on the Obama Economic Recovery Board. Needless to say, the close collaboration and gobs of cash and loans ending up under Kleiner's control should be a cause for concern especially with the publicly unresolved issue of EEStor Inc. floating around in the background.
Some of the disclosure documents were redacted based on FOIA exemption 5 USC 552(b) (4) which exempts from disclosure "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential." Kleiner Perkins investment Think North America chose this option.
FOIA Request Courtesy of EEStor Mad Man, RT!
5 comments:
How come stories about eestor being denied patents are not showing up here? Is this site simply trying to push eestor and zen, or one that is posting all that they can about eestor?
Consider that I have posted on here a number of times, and all have gone through EXCEPT for the previous post about this. I posted it on the OBL article. How would that look to the FTC?
Oh, I just assumed that this WAS a thinly veiled promotional site. Really.
What are you babbling about Windbourne? Patents and final rejections are discussed ad nausea at http://TheEEStory.com. Keep in mind at least one of EEStor's granted patents received a final rejection....ergo, it aint over til EEStor says it is.
Incidently, EEStor is the greatest company on Earth and their employees are gods. Everything they touch turns to gold or alumina coated barium titanate. Their building in Cedar Park, TX is sacred shrine to the electron. Praise be their name. All hail everyone at EEStor. Long live EEStor, geniuses at work! EEStor: American Heroes!
Windbourne, how's that gonna look to the Federal Trade Commission?
MUHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
It's unfortunate that the USPTO term "Final Rejection" is so inaptly named when it's simply part of the process by which the validity of a patent registration is established. That's not to say that this patentor any other one will eventually survive scrutiny but the "Final" in "Final Rejection" is anything but.
Well, at least the grafting of the government is leading to jobs here and in technological advances which have real benefit to humanity. Unlike, say, funneling money to Haliburton. What do they do other than build nuclear facilities for Iran?
Post a Comment